Octane vs redshift 2023 reddit

Octane vs redshift 2023 reddit. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the… I'm new at 3D and C4D, and I'm not sure whether I should invest in a 3rd party renderer like Redshift, octane or V-ray, or if it's possible to learn using the built in renderer. I've used both and I would pick Redshift every time at this stage. Anyway I have a job on which is based on something I did back when I was using Redshift and it was too much work to convert From what I've seen and heard, Redshift is a lot more stable but Octane has been getting better. Octane vs Redshift for interior renders My Serie A 2023/24 broadcast design for Eleven Although redshift has an advantage in that specific rending results. instagram. I think this will change in the near future and Redshift will be the best but for now Octane is still better! If you are using C4D, Redshift is a way to go, because Maxon acquired it recently. There’s some nice tutorials for how to use Octane in Houdini by Rohan Dalvi on YouTube. ). Octane with the 1070 feels a bit slow. You can have more GPUs than you can stick into a computer basically. Redshift vs Octane vs Arnold vs Vray, Great Render Engine Comparison Test! Tutorial. but I've been using redshift for 8 months in 3ds max, cinema4d, Maya, and Houdini. Personally i did make the shift from octane to redshift because redshift is a lot faster and also the integration into houdini is significantly better than octane in nearly everyway i think redshift is just all in all a better engine but specifically in houdini its nice to be able to very easily use houdini attributes and other features natively without needing to do weird workarounds. Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. Welcome to the Autodesk Maya Subreddit. I hope it helps brotha. Light grouping is a breeze, and compositing was a joy. Well when you ‘update’ to an entirely new version, it doesn’t overwrite your old one. NOTE: Redshift versions 3. May 5, 2023 · When you use GPU to render with Octane or Redshift, you take advantage of GPU speed. But in reality both renders are capable of getting similar results. . . Apr 16, 2021 · The interest in reasonable representation and 3D models is growing day after day. 0, C4D, Redshift and Arnold jobs available in early beta in 2023). so its like 2. Fast does not = best. Sit back, 18 votes, 14 comments. Multiple GPUs allow it to divide the workload, especially rendering complex scenes. Redshift also handles a lot more geometry much better, kind of like Arnold. Octane Vs Redshift! Comment One thing to add is a bit of understanding on the difference between octane and redshift. but with recent updates, the IPR has been slow, or sometimes if I start the ipr it crashes (mainly when tessellation and displacement are enabled). If using Redshift, you need to invest a large amount of money while Octane requires robust hardware to avoid being crash. Cinema 4D with the Octane Renderer works really well and fast but when I try to use Redshift everything is turning extremely slow and laggy. Octane is finicky at times but just like Arnold, I prefer it's out of the box results. It has a limit listed on its website. 1. IG📸: https://www. are being paid off by . FTFY. Click a flair to sort by topic and find a wealth of information regarding the content you're looking for. Octane 2023 Features Octane 2023 introduces Meshlet Streaming and Neural Rendering with Real Time Temporal Denoising. 1 Beta: 21 votes, 12 comments. Features now in development during the Octane 2023. Overall, Renderman is a more stable and customizable rendering engine. I use 3ds max for achitectural modelling and viz and my vega does its job pretty well there - thanks to HBM2 and its bus, Max is able to manipulate heavy scenes better, though i use CPU for rendering. in redshift, after applying either an objectID or a puzzlematte, i get a black render and it doesnt show up in the render view AOV preview. Go to Octane r/Octane. Even if it's cpu only that's still pretty great considering they got rid of all the old trial installers. its a mess compared to redshift for bigger projects and reliable pipelines. 6. Apr 13, 2024 · In testing, Redshift is 40-50% faster than Octane for the same scenes. 80. Mar 1, 2023 · Йо, в цьому ролику Dagar розбере по пунктах, який рендер в чому кращий. Hi, I'm not an expert in redshift. “Tiger” by Daniel Bystedt running in the viewport on Eevee. I see, thanks for the information guys. If you are just a hobbyist, maybe these problems are less of an issue. 15 is now available. That's mostly what i heard about octane to. 3K subscribers in the Octane community. I'm using Blender for Octane and have no trouble while working in rendermode, but when it's time to hit the render key, it all freezes up May 12, 2023 · According to the tests above, we can clearly say that RTX4090 is the best GPU for Redshift, Octane and V-Ray rendering. I used to be a Redshift guy until I switched to V-Ray a couple of years ago because I wanted the option of rendering on hardware that wasn't Nvidia, as well as I like to own my software. Source: quora. Jul 4, 2021 · In the end, Redshift is so fast, and its production features get better with every release. Both benchmarks are crucial in finding the best Hardware for GPU Rendering, and ultimately the best Computer for Rendering. com/s_twenty_six/Behance - behance. It is likely that your local computer or your budget may not meet all requirements. CPU hovers around 6% and GPU at 0. is like 3 x 3090s with less power draw. It’s time for you to think of using a cloud rendering service. Octane is faster in my opinion but its really hard to compare. On the other hand, support has always been very helpful, so there's that. 14 and later are not compatible with C4D 2023. The new Ada Lovelace architecture has improved a lot of the performance for RTX4090. You will see a faster Benchmark time for sure. #cinema4d #octanerender #redshiftInstagram - https://www. Helloo, I just starting with Octane (and I am fairly new to working with 3D in general) and I wonder if you maybe could help me out with my issue rendering. Reply. So you can always go back to using your “old” install as your primary version if you’re waiting for a plug-in or somthing. Vray continues to be the king of renderers, despite the advances made by others. Most of the newer options like redshift, Octane, corona etc can get good results but there's more to the story then just fast or pretty renders. This build includes plugins for Cinema 4D, Maya, 3ds Max, Houdini, Katana and Blender. Cinema 4D 2024 is the first version of a massive architectural change, introducing a new core and speed improvements. Add a Comment. That said what the "best renderer" is can't be answered. Tags. Intel doctored the ARM Embree library so it didn't use the M-series 2nd SIMD (for AVX2 support) prior to release. Apr 24, 2023 · Looking for a mesmerizing visual experience that showcases the best of digital art and animation? Look no further than the Redshift 2023 Demo Reel. The only problem is I've tried installing both renderers to no success. The status bar says "Updating Geometry 220/1050 (219)", where 219 is the frame it's currently working on out of a 1050 frame animation. So yeah, redshift is a good choice if render speed is very important. What that essentially means is octane is "physically correct" which is why it's easy to pick up and make good looking things, where as Redshift is "broken physics" which you can easily break and it takes a little more playing with settings to get stuff Redshift: Likes: It feels more like your standard render engine. Blendeer for Octane freezes when hitting render. It was only about 120 frames and close to 2GB. Questions, Comments, Renders, News, Information about Octane Renderer. As someone mentioned redshift is a bias render, where corona and octane are unbiased, so they mimic real life more accurately. Both have their pros and cons. Redshift is nice in Houdini as well, that’s what I use basically 100% of the time. What works for motion design doesn't work Now in terms of upside, xpu is a cpu/GPU hybrid renderer, so if you have a big cpu farm, you can take full advantage of your available resources. Redshift will be faster. Redshift is a fine renderer but support is still thin isn't widely used at the moment. RedShift is faster , but quality is a little bit less. r/Octane. It is the popular GPU pendant to the well-known CPU Benchmark Cinebench R23, for which you can check the Results here. Oct 6, 2023 · To use Octane and Redshift you will need a GPU that has CUDA-Cores, meaning you will need an NVIDIA GPU. As far as my experience goes Redshift is faster but Octane is more stable and has more features. Also it's nowhere near plug and play. More importantly, learn the science of rendering and material creation, rather than just learning "that knob makes it shiny". However, the results may get more closely similar when 3D artists adjust the settings. The recent version seems to be prone to crashes though. The deep integration of redshift inside c4d definitely is a big plus. com/s26_motionDi cpu - only, so speed even on a best cpu is way slower to a mid level gpu. Bias render engines are needed when you become pro and need to have more control. However, Octane can get a boost with the addition of GPUs. This is the reason why Blizzard uses Redshift over Octane. com/theo_kerr_/Tweet Me: https://twitter. But redshift really isn’t as fast as everyone says. There is a bias on this subreddit I found with with blendr, redshift, unreal, GPU based, etc. However Octane is also very limiting as to what you can do, where Redshift offers more flexibility if you're willing to take the time to learn it. 5% in my task manager. Macbook Pro M2 Max Benchmark results (Cinebench R23 + Redshift) Yeah but remember that Cinebench isn't a valid test for Apple Silicon. 0 or 2023. I've uninstalled, downloaded the right versions, directed them to the plugins folder in the preferences, you name it Redshift is still blazing fast but requires more input from the user to fine-tune. Also entagma is a good source for multiple rendering options in houdini. I can work for hours without any crash. Basically try to do as much as you can in houdini you’ll learn fastest that way. I like Corona, it's easy to use and has a lot of nice features (decals, shatter, …. Karma is still in development so it needs some work still. Ever since its release, Eevee has made waves when one demo after the next showcased its power despite being a rasterization engine. With the help of a good GPU, your rendering time with Redshift and Arnold GPU is cut down several times. We share and discuss topics regarding the world's leading 3D-modeling software. Ram sometimes gets up to around 13%. Octane allows for two GPUs based on their lower tier and then Redshift allows for 8+. I find Redshift’s render view to be more useful during lookdev, lighting. I was an Octane guy. What do you advise me to do? Learn redshift and save the money, or should I continue with octane? Receiving dozens of questions from our customers asking about which render engine is best for Cinema 4D software with GPU rendering? We decided to make a ser When it comes to stability it’s definitely redshift. This is the main thing that prevent me from switching to Redshift. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Octane Vs Redshift! Comment down your favorite one. That being said, as of writing this Octane is $20 a month to subscribe, and For example some 3d render engines like octane/redshift and some else things that allegedly utilize CUDA only. Just in case. I have redshift free on my Maxon one subscription and my octane yearly subscription just ended a couple days ago. 4 USD (at this time as Octane is only priced in Euro's). It has a very familiar look and feel as Arnold or VRay. At least now you can work on rs while your license is used on another machine to render. "Using Vray for Cinema is a problematic hole you don't want to go down. But it's the best when it comes to After checking the task manager while using it showed ~90% - 100% usage of the GPU. You can render out particles in octane / redshift, you just need to add the octane/redshift tag to the emitter and select particle, or add geometry. A bit slow but worth it. They also plan to fully support crypto, deeps, and a slew of other features. net/emilymotionArtstation - artstation. What i love about corona is that the render time is amazing and the whole denoising thing is mindblowing! 🤣 And when i use an image enhancer like topaz gigapixel, i could get a 6 k resolution by producing a 1080 or even a 720 at 100 dpi and enhancing it; it would take WAY less time than vray for example. Now last night I stopped the export and continued in the morning and suddenly I can see the estimated time and the green loading bar on top of the Cinema 4D icon. Vray is a mature option that is well tested with few bugs, and when problem DO arise they are very responsive. Octane could use a maximum of 20 GPUs, while Redshift can use up to 8 GPUs at the same time. We have now been testing with Redshift and I just bought c4d/Redshift for my 6-GPU rig. It just installs a second copy of C4D. Thats a nice performance bump. I might be wrong but I think Redshift can use your RAM to store the sim and not just the VRAM like it would be with Octane. But I would double check the current versions for each program and compare to see where they are development-wise. If you are using other Render Engines, be sure to check compatibility here. Redshift can be used both by an independent artist, but has a lot more team-focused tools for a full production pipeline. Redshift renders scenes many times faster than existing CPU-based renderers. You plug in the real-world variables of, say, brushed aluminum and add a real-world sunlight system and it Oct 5, 2021 · The results show a huge difference. As soon as you turn the settings up to something like production quality, (it’s default is only 3 diffuse bounces for example) it starts crawling. Some versions of VRAY used to additionally support OpenCL, meaning you could use an AMD GPU, but this is no longer the case. Octane would be my second choice cause it's fast, easier than redshift (in my opinion) it has more features, and typically does look better. Again, Redshift greatly outweighs Octane about the render time. It's fast. 2. New comments cannot be posted octane works quicker out of the box for single users. The kind of very fast procedural materials that you can do in Redshift cannot be done in Unreal to the same refinement. 1 Share. in order for it to work i need to disable the glass layer in front, but that means i need to render it twice to get the proper beauty and aov. May 1, 2024 · In our tests, Redshift was often faster than OctaneRender for the same scenes, with speeds ranging from 10% to 50%, depending on scene complexity. 0 gold releasing later this year. What works for a solo artist doesn't work for ILM. Any information (a cube, a camera or a light, for instance) has to be translated into what Redshift understands. I run solo for the company I work for. Every renderer has its strengths and weaknesses and depends on the use case. But yea, RS, Octane, XP & GSG are all 2023 ready. 8. We conducted a comparison of Redshift and OctaneRender using our 4x RTX 3090 machine, which features an Intel Xeon W-2245 @ 3. I know the fundamental of redshift but nothing more, with octane otherwise I have 2 years of experience. It's like asking what "the best car" is. com. It's fast, you are familiar with it which means you will work faster and it's very well integrated. Quality wise redshift is not up to par with Arnold or VRay in my experience, so purely from a quality point of view it's not the best renderer. If I had a choice now, where to invest my time and money, I'd probably go for Redshift Jan 5, 2022 · "The Ultimate Introduction to Redshift For Cinema 4d" Course:https://mographplus. Main con is that to get truly good results in Unreal Engine, you need to go through the a proper process of UV unwrapping and texturing. Приємного перегляду;)Стаття по Never tried Octane But the idea that one renderer is objectively better than the rest in every way is definitely false. 36 minutes 33 seconds for Redshift and 2 hours 13 minutes for Octane. com/l/IBmVD"V-Ray 5 Masterclass: Your Complete Guide to V-Ray for 3d Volumes are ridiculously fast in RS. Also, if you do have the time to wait, h20 will be karma xpu v1. So I recently got a new setup and need to download octane/redshift to Cinema 4d so I can continue working. For example, I remember blender octane had a really awesome Octane custom AOV node system. Like in substance painter for example. Redshift is the world’s first fully GPU-accelerated, biased renderer. It's slower, but it's more robust and customizable than Redshift. displacement renders fine at first Nov 24, 2022 · Full support and priority access to the world’s largest GPU Rendering service (with Stable Diffusion 2. What works for ILM doesn't work for a solo artist. I can’t say I’ve used 2023 a You need to find the corresponding nodes in redshift. 5. Vray 6, Corona, Redshift I've been working with Vray for a long time and Nov 30, 2023 · Oddly enough that increase is also equal to the annual subscription cost for Octane which is $264. Especially with animation and video, Redshift’s rendering speed is even more outstanding, which can save days or even weeks. In addition, we also included Redshift as our default renderer. I wonder if Houdini has it. Share With: Rate This Article. Octane is an unbiased renderer, and Redshift is a biased renderer (like VRay) If you plan on doing production work or even a high-end reel to get production work, you're going to need some rendering power. you are adding 6000 more cuda cores so that is about half the speed of a 3090. But I do miss out on a client project sometimes when they require Redshift rendering. Not sure if its worth the extra $$$ for a little bump in render time. Both deliver excellent quality. I intend to use it only for study purposes for the time being. Octane on the other hand is crashing fairly often. and in a case where im am rendering 10-15 shots this is a big It feels Arnold is running really good with the 5950X (I also have 64GB of 3600Mhz GSkill RAM). That means Octane utilizes sophisticated mathematics to duplicate exactly how light and materials actually function in the real world. 2K subscribers in the Octane community. Absolutely love unreal+Octane though. You could composite passes with nodes before they're rendered. gumroad. C4D/Redshift renders a couple hundred frames of an animation and a decent speed, then will hang up all at once for no apparent reason. Although payed exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: . They claimed it made negligible difference until Apple stepped up and provided versions which Redshift & Maya performance. Because of its massive amount of cores and parallelism, GPU based renderers like Octane and Redshift are excellent in creating extremely fast graphics. true. The whole difference between the two is that Octane is an unbiased renderer, and Redshift is biased. It runs extremely slow to preview really simple scenes like 2 primitives, a dome light and a sun. C4D is simply more robust and can handle more. the problem here is that redshift rendering is taking minutes over minutes. probably because nvidia's GPUs dedicate a sizeable portion of their die area to ray tracing specific hardware, and lighting in renders is always ray traced I’ve been working for quite some years in Octane with of course some bugs and freezes here and there, but pretty solid on average. if you want good courses on redshift, Greyscale gorilla has a really good one if you are c4d user. This is persistent with my own experiments with these two renderers. TLDR: Vray is a problem for Cinema users. Atmosphere and fog is the easiest thing I've ever done. You can fine tune redshift a bit more and the learning curve is a bit more demanding but worth it. Questions, Comments, Renders, News, Information about Octane Renderer Jan 22, 2024 · The OctaneBench Benchmark Rendering Results are assigned linearly scaling OctaneBench Points. I did a test with a cached Houdini Sim in Octane for C4D. Octane render allows users to see a rendered scene in near real-time. And no Octane isn’t superior. Blender octane also had node-based lights and you could do some complex stuff in there, that one I also couldn't figure out so far. com/tr_kerr_?lang=enMY classes 🔥: http://theokerr. Really great write up, on your reasons for the switching. To say it shortly, if you were able to achieve realism in octane you'll achieve it in redshift as well. I expected some form of scalability, but from a few tests, it has been very disappointing. Be prepared to put every mesh you want in Unreal RedShift is a third-party renderer. I went physical > vray > corona. Octane outperforms Redshift as it looks much sharper. I settled on Octane because of the speed. I'm searching if there is an equivalent to ORC cloud rendering from Octane but with Redshift. at first, everything renders fine and faster. I expected some form of scalability, but from a few tests, I appear to gain 35% speed. There are some things that have limitations, but you get used to it, there are some tutorials out there about the different nodes you need. Yes, Unreal can do almost everything Octane can, but be ready to go through a steep learning curve because it doesn’t look “photoreal” out of the box and its logic is very different from other renderers. Octane is pretty well integrated into Houdini now. 5 x 3090s. So I wanted to ask you guys, do you think the 5950X + Arnold combination is faster than the Octane + 1070 combination for the same scene with similar materials & lightning? I think they are both great render Octane can be faster in some ways as well and the materials and render settings are a lot more user friendly. Mar 5, 2015 · Version 3. Thanks for help! specs: When rendering in redshift (specifically from the C4D render queue my renders take forever and neither my GPU or CPU ever break 10% usage. However, if you are comfortable with your general workflow, and simply want faster and more photo-real feedback, Octane for Blender should be fine for you. Back when I decided to move beyond C4D render. Interior scenes look way better than Octane. Released at the end of 2022, till now RTX4090 still is a beast in terms of rendering. It doesn't appear to be frozen in this case as the progress bar in the When I render a sequence I never got any estimated render time even after updating Cinema 4D, Octane and Redshift to the newest version. I don't know an equivalent in cloud computing render farm that perform like that and is quite affordable. It can be leveraged to produce outstanding results with relatively quick render times. 4M subscribers in the nvidia community. Locked post. So, if Maxon is increasing the prices for C4D + Redshift (the only option they offer for C4D now), then you are getting the full RS which means with the GPU renderer. Just grab the demo version and give it a try. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. art/classesLUTS For VFX artists and c I've seen a lot of my peers use redshift, and i really like the results it gets,, and i'd like to play around with the abilities it has as a spectral renderer vs Cycles as an RGB renderer,, but i hear a lot of octane artists shit on octane for blender saying it's a buggy mess,, and otoy really takes it time to update it,,, and i've had trouble getting clean renders out of it with my computer Jan 26, 2022 · What is the best render engine for you, when it comes to your Cinema4D workflow in 2022?In this video, I wanted to explore deeper how to figure out what is t Jan 3, 2023 · Eevee is Blender’s real-time rasterization render engine, which replaced the Blender Internal renderer in Blender 2. Feb 17, 2021 · 3| Cloud rendering service for Redshift vs Octane. 90GHz CPU, 128GB RAM, and 512GB SSD. 1. Octane is an unbiased render, redshift is biased. Octane is a decent renderer but development has been slow, mistakes have been made and users are deeply frustrated. As a result, different software and tools are popping into the market to me Octane is, like others have mentioned quite a bit easier to learn and unbiased in nature but also quite a bit more unstable (I've encountered this in a larger productions before and it can be a real pain in the ass when things start to fly off the rails) but when it works its actually pretty great and has a pretty straight-forward learning When Redshift worked, it was fast, the images were clear, and the AOV's were much easier to set up and work with than in Renderman. Its biased approach to rendering makes it one of the fastest around. Redshift is well known for its lightning-fast speed while Arnold is best for high-quality and detailed images. It is quickly becoming the go-to render engine for the motion design market. I'm thinking I have some setting somewhere that is throttling my render but cant find any information anywhere. Octane/Redshift not showing up after installation. 0. We've been working with Octane for the past year, and we observe that going from a 2x RTX 4090 to a 6x RTX 4090 it is very scalable, almost proportional. 5. Redshift 2 Maya - Tutorial #10 - GI Engines - Optimization Copy and paste this on youtube, video explains various GI engines in redshift. Thanks in advance! Physical isnt terrible but will help u learn the basics. If you're doing fog and SSS it's much faster than Octane. That means it runs on top of Cinema 4D and it uses your CPU and your GPU to render. The Node editor for the textures makes sense in both programs, I have a feeling Redshift might be slightly more on point but it might just be a preference thing. We recognize that this introduces issues that may cause frustrations and have released 3 subsequent updates to fix high priority items. Though most renderers get close, I still consider prman one of the best. I am thinking 2 x 4090s. The other advantage is that RD does not break down as often. its not normal! i just tested it with a small object and a window only and still rendering very slow. Save time and money, and unleash your creativity! Apr 27, 2023 · Both of them are excellent 3D render engines. Yes karma has xpu but its even more limited. Use Redshift or dive deeper and try harder at learning Octane. Questions, Comments, Renders, News, Information about Octane Renderer Members Online • Zahid_Bhat . Most artists believe the octane benching system is better than the redshift benchmark and the benchmark results forum. Octane or Redshift are fast gpu renderers. Apr 28, 2019 · That said, Vray and Redshift, while faster than the others (CPU (+GPU?) and GPU respectively) also look underwhelming esp where transparent Shaders are concerned. qn mr rs az io sk hv au eg uw